estefania_hl
06/04/2026, 5:12 PMestefania_hl
06/04/2026, 5:15 PMChiranjeet Mishra
06/05/2026, 12:17 PMestefania_hl
06/05/2026, 12:21 PMestefania_hl
06/05/2026, 12:21 PMestefania_hl
06/08/2026, 2:19 PMestefania_hl
06/08/2026, 2:19 PMChiranjeet Mishra
06/08/2026, 3:37 PMestefania_hl
06/08/2026, 4:13 PMChiranjeet Mishra
06/08/2026, 5:53 PM{
"result": "La observación ha sido registrada correctamente."
}
Remove everything else — IDs, URLs, HTTP methods, references. The assistant reads whatever your server sends back, so keep it simple and human-friendly.
----
Fix 2 — Add this to your assistant's system prompt
When you execute the "Registrar Observaciones" tool:
- NEVER read any internal IDs, URLs, references, or technical fields aloud.
- Only use the confirmation message to respond to the customer.
- Say something like: "Su observación ha sido registrada. ¿Hay algo más en lo que pueda ayudarle?"
----
To test: Make a test call, trigger the tool, and confirm the assistant only speaks the confirmation — nothing technical.
Both fixes together will permanently stop this behavior. Let me know if you need helpestefania_hl
06/08/2026, 6:26 PMestefania_hl
06/09/2026, 8:37 AMresult field from the endpoint and I have also added the following instructions to the system prompt to explicitly prevent the assistant from reading URLs, endpoints, tool information, technical fields, or any tool-related content aloud.
Despite these changes, the issue still occurred during this test.
Could you please review this example and let me know if you can identify what might have happened, or if there is anything else I should modify on my side?
Thank you very much in advance for your help.estefania_hl
06/09/2026, 8:38 AMChiranjeet Mishra
06/09/2026, 3:28 PMurlresponse), the LLM can sometimes reference them.
The most reliable fix is to clean up what your tool returns. Ideally it should only send back a simple, human-friendly message — nothing technical. For example:
json
{
"result": "Done! Someone will be in touch shortly."
}
If your tool response already looks clean and this is still happening, could you share what your tool is currently returning? That'll help us pinpoint exactly what the LLM is picking up.
In the meantime, I'm logging call 019eab7b-3bdf-7000-8fb8-e8984a509ffe (Jun 09, 10:24:38) for our engineering team to review the transcript and see exactly what was spoken.Chiranjeet Mishra
06/10/2026, 4:44 AM