Parth0774
03/24/2025, 3:15 AMVapi Support Bot
03/24/2025, 3:17 AMParth0774
03/24/2025, 3:23 AMParth0774
03/24/2025, 3:23 AMVapi Support Bot
03/24/2025, 3:24 AMjson
{
"assistantId": "your-assistant-id-here"
}
To fix this issue, you should:
1. Check your webhook response format - Make sure your Make.com scenario is returning the proper format with the assistantId field in the response. This is crucial for Vapi to track which assistant handled the call.
2. Verify assistant configuration - Even when using server URLs, the assistant needs to be properly configured in Vapi for tracking purposes. According to [troubleshooting documentation](https://discord.com/channels/1211482211119796234/1211483291191083018/threads/1344225187939352586), this is essential for dashboard integration.
3. Consider direct assignment as a test - As a troubleshooting step, try directly assigning an assistant to your phone number temporarily to see if insights appear. This can help determine if the issue is with the server URL implementation or something else.Vapi Support Bot
03/24/2025, 3:24 AMParth0774
03/24/2025, 3:25 AMParth0774
03/24/2025, 3:25 AMVapi Support Bot
03/24/2025, 3:26 AMjson
{
"assistantId": "your-assistant-id-here"
}
Your current payload has an "assistant" field with a value of "88. JSON string" and an "assistantOverrides" object, but it's missing the explicit "assistantId" field that Vapi needs to properly track which assistant handled the call.
To fix this issue:
1. Modify your webhook response format in Make.com to include the "assistantId" field directly in the root of the JSON response.
2. Ensure the assistantId value is a valid UUID of an assistant that exists in your Vapi account.
3. If you're using transient agents, you might still need to create a permanent record of the assistant in Vapi for proper tracking, even if you're dynamically selecting which one to use.
Would you be able to modify your Make.com scenario to return the proper format with the assistantId field? This should help Vapi properly track your calls and populate the dashboard insights.
Source:
- [Troubleshooting chatdash integration with Vapi](https://discord.com/channels/1211482211119796234/1211483291191083018/threads/1344225187939352586)Parth0774
03/24/2025, 3:27 AMVapi Support Bot
03/24/2025, 3:28 AMjson
{
"assistantId": "9ed2e839-fd4a-43b0-86af-b5a857340310"
}
According to the [troubleshooting documentation](https://discord.com/channels/1211482211119796234/1211483291191083018/threads/1344225187939352586), including this assistantId field directly in the root of your JSON response should help Vapi properly track which assistant handled the call, allowing your dashboard and chatdash to display the correct insights.
Is there anything else you'd like help with regarding this implementation?
Source:
- [Troubleshooting chatdash integration with Vapi](https://discord.com/channels/1211482211119796234/1211483291191083018/threads/1344225187939352586)Parth0774
03/24/2025, 3:29 AMParth0774
03/24/2025, 3:29 AMParth0774
03/24/2025, 3:29 AMParth0774
03/24/2025, 3:29 AMVapi Support Bot
03/24/2025, 3:30 AMjson
{
"assistantId": "9ed2e839-fd4a-43b0-86af-b5a857340310"
}
Looking at your previous payload, it appears you're using an "assistant" field with a value of "88. JSON string" and an "assistantOverrides" object, but missing the explicit "assistantId" field that Vapi requires for proper tracking.
The code snippet you shared with the "omit" function seems to be removing certain fields from your data object. If this is part of your Make.com scenario, you'll want to ensure that after any omissions, you're still including the crucial "assistantId" field in your final response.
Would you be able to modify your webhook implementation to ensure the assistantId is included directly in the root of your JSON response? This should resolve the "no assistant assigned" issue in your call logs and enable insights in chatdash.
Is there anything specific about implementing this change in your Make.com scenario that you'd like help with?
Source:
- [Troubleshooting chatdash integration with Vapi](https://discord.com/channels/1211482211119796234/1211483291191083018/threads/1344225187939352586)Parth0774
03/24/2025, 3:32 AMParth0774
03/24/2025, 3:32 AMVapi Support Bot
03/24/2025, 3:33 AMjson
{
"assistantId": "9ed2e839-fd4a-43b0-86af-b5a857340310"
}
Your current setup with the "omit" function might be removing fields from your data object, but what's crucial is that the final response sent to Vapi includes this assistantId field. If you're using the "omit" function but still ensuring the assistantId is included in the final response, then yes, you should be able to get insights.
The key is making sure that regardless of what other processing you're doing, the final webhook response that Vapi receives contains the assistantId in the correct format. This is what allows Vapi to properly track which assistant handled the call and populate your dashboard with the appropriate insights.
Is there anything else you'd like to know about implementing this change in your Make.com scenario?
Source:
- [Troubleshooting chatdash integration with Vapi](https://discord.com/channels/1211482211119796234/1211483291191083018/threads/1344225187939352586)Parth0774
03/24/2025, 4:37 AMParth0774
03/24/2025, 4:37 AMParth0774
03/24/2025, 4:38 AMParth0774
03/24/2025, 2:50 PMParth0774
03/24/2025, 2:51 PMKyle Brunker
03/24/2025, 10:50 PMParth0774
03/24/2025, 11:51 PMParth0774
03/24/2025, 11:52 PMParth0774
03/25/2025, 12:25 AMParth0774
03/25/2025, 12:25 AMShubham Bajaj
03/25/2025, 2:40 AMParth0774
03/25/2025, 2:42 AM